Skip to main content

Guardians of the Galaxy 2 Review

What I liked: Baby Groot is the best thing about this movies. If you have seen the trailer with the extended conversation between Rocket the raccoon and baby Groot about when to push the detonation button, you have seen the best of the movie and if you're pressed for time, can probably leave it at that. If you have more time you could expand your viewing to include the opening fight scene, with some pretty awesome alien smashing action, rainbows, and classic rock music, and the concluding fight scene, which involves baby Groot, explosions, and Pacman. If you really want to branch out you can watch a fight scene in the middle that mostly involves about 100 mercenaries being beaten by a raccoon in the woods. I liked that Rocky has moved on from his boxing career to being an intergalactic criminal, it really seems like a step up. I predict that in the next movie he will be the underdog in a boxing match with an alien and will make an incredible comeback to win. I liked that the bad guys' whole space ship fleet was just an arcade game. If my experience in flight simulators is any indication, this is not a very effective military. I have decided that the firework funeral is the best plan ever. I hope my wake will consist of nothing but millions of fireworks.

What I didn't: First and foremost the music was not as good. There is a lot of cool classic rock music they really could have picked better songs. The evil master plan is dumb both in premise and execution. Evil villains these days, the all want to rule the universe. Can't they just try and rob a bank or something? Build a cool death ray? You may remember from the last movie that this group of heroes is made up entirely of scoundrels: assassins, thieves, bounty hunters, mercenaries, etc. It seems to be one of the goals of this movie to remind us that these heroes are bad people. They succeed rather gruesomely. Most of what made the first movie funny was that the jokes were unexpected and well timed. Instead of coming up with more clever or unexpected ideas the writers just expanded the jokes they made the first time. So, there were more inappropriate jokes, more awkward statements, and more random things that happened. But since it was all more of the same none of it was unexpected and so it lost most of the comic effectiveness. The other thing that the first movie had going for it was that it really didn't take itself too seriously. This one tries to be a little bit profound which really works against the whole silly nonsense thing they had going. So, it is mostly nonsense but not good at being silly.

Who should watch this? If you liked the first one, you will like this one, it's more of the same. If you didn't like the first one, you won't like this one, it's more of the same.

Would I watch it again? I'd rather watch the first one but there are scenes from this one that I will find online.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Titanic

What I liked: Liked is definitely the wrong word for it but the scenes of the sinking of the Titanic were masterful. They were technologically impressive, apparently remarkably accurate, and emotionally gripping. The variety of ways in which different people dealt with a completely hopeless situation was both touching and thought provoking. Especially beautiful was the string quartet. In isolation from the love story, the sinking of the Titanic is a tragic reminder of the cost of hubris and the necessity of regulating emergency procedures and capacities. It carries similar gravitas as a war film. At the 25th anniversary of the film, I can appreciate how Titanic has impacted movies made later.  What I didn't: So here's the thing. I feel very bad for you if you died in the sinking of the Titanic. I feel less bad for you if you managed to get on a lifeboat on the Titanic and then decided to get off. I question all of your decision making and priorities if you decide to get off a...

Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them Reveiw

What I liked: For a movie based on what is in essence a fictional encyclopedia, this movie has a surprising amount of plot. Not great plot, but more than I usually get from reading an alphabetical reference book. I liked the dopey sidekick, his facial expressions were great and he was the only one who acknowledged that what happening on screen was not actually normal. I liked that the president led the tiny army of US wizards to their tiny battle in a subway. So as military victories go, this was not one for the history books, for many reasons. But it did lend more meaning to the phrase Commander in Chief. I felt like Dr Who was once again a bow tie wearing socially awkward guy who lives in a box that is bigger on the inside. Some of the creatures were cool but the CGI didn't quite make them alive. I liked the sloth monkey, I don't really know who it was or what it was doing but I would support a slothmonkey planet of the apes crossover. I like that the guy from SWAT has fina...

Free Guy

What I liked: I liked Guy. That is in fact the point but I like how happy, carefree, and wholesome he is in what is essentially Grand Theft Auto. I like what the NPCs decide to focus on as they achieve consciousness. I liked the ridiculous YouTubers getting all philosophical about Guy and how he radically changed game play. I liked that so much of the game economy was about silly skins, just like a real game, and how that completely confused the NPCs. I liked the fight between Dude and Guy and its resolution, it managed to stay very on theme. The item cameos were fun, like seeing the Portal gun, or the Fortnite piƱata. I liked guy finding the med kit and building up an inventory.  What I didn't: I am not be a lawyer but I am suspicious that there maybe more efficient ways of obtaining evidence of copyright violation than playing 12 hours of a computer game every day. With that in mind I think the evidence points to the heroine enjoying the game far more than she lets on. On the top...