Skip to main content

The Zoo Keeper's Wife Review

What I liked: This is an inspiring story. Not, as one might imagine from the title and cover art, in an early 20th century "We bought a zoo" kind of way or even a look at all these cute zoo animals kind of way. It is inspiring in a Schindler's List kind of way, the story of a Polish family who used their destroyed zoo as a cover to smuggle more than 300 Jews out of the Warsaw ghetto. This is similar in scale to the efforts of the ten Boom family and about 1/4 the scale of Schindler's operation. But it this endeavor, in addition to hiding the Jews and passing them on to other safe houses, included a massive smuggling operation to extract them from the ghetto. The characters make courageous decisions in terrible terrible circumstances. Clearly the main characters are brave and mastermind an elaborate rescue operation, but all of the side characters ring true too. I don't know if the characters represent individuals or are composites but the film did an excellent job of presenting them as real people who do their best to make the right decision. From an old professor who refuses to be rescued so that he can stay with and comfort the many children in the ghetto, to the Nazi maid working for the family who safe guards their secret saying "you have been good to me now I will be good to you," to bakers who run a forgery operation to supply fake passes, to the entomologist who vastly broadens the number of people they are able to get out of the ghetto, all of the characters are clearly complex and trying hard to be good. But the film also captures the tension of never knowing who can be trusted, you feel the anxiety every time there is a new person that this one could be the spy who brings the whole thing crashing down.

What I didn't: So, I came up with a rather petty list in the beginning of the film before it was very clear what it would be about. We'll start with that and then move on to how this episode in history is itself something that ranks very high on my list of things I don't like. The family has a pet skunk who lives in their house and sleeps with their very cute little boy. Of all the creatures in a zoo that you could share your house with, I don't know why you would choose a skunk. In the very beginning of the movie the zoo is bombed releasing the animals to roam Warsaw. The soldiers take down the elephant (with only four shots from regular rifles) but apparently make no efforts to deter the lions and tigers who go wandering through the city streets. During the bombing raid apparently the entire population of Warsaw goes to the train station to try and leave the city. For future reference, when your city is being bombed you want to stay very far away from infrastructure hubs. Also if you are ever a bomber a zoo is not an infrastructure hub and there are probably more effective military targets. The film stays very tight with a single villain. This makes it easy to keep track of: the rival zoologist who is a threat to the zoo animals, the zoo, and the zoo keeper family is also one of the major officials in charge of the city occupation, maintaining the ghetto, busting up forgery operations, and deploying occupation troops. While this is tidy and helps us focus all our fear and animosity at a single representative of Nazi evil, it fails to represent the much more staggering, highly organized, highly pervasive reality in which all of these jobs would have been done by separate people: an army of deadly observers filling the city, each one equally threatening to the fragile rescue and resistance efforts. The movie covers almost the entirety of the war and the way the passage of time is represented is confusing.

Who should watch this? Not people expecting a movie about a zoo. This is not appropriate for children. It is very tense. There are several execution style shootings, and many dead bodies. One rape is strongly referenced and there is an attempted rape.

Would I watch it again? It was a good movie. As mentioned it is an amazing inspiring story and does a great job of representing many different characters. I would rather have seen one about zoo animals. Maybe next time I will watch planet earth.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Titanic

What I liked: Liked is definitely the wrong word for it but the scenes of the sinking of the Titanic were masterful. They were technologically impressive, apparently remarkably accurate, and emotionally gripping. The variety of ways in which different people dealt with a completely hopeless situation was both touching and thought provoking. Especially beautiful was the string quartet. In isolation from the love story, the sinking of the Titanic is a tragic reminder of the cost of hubris and the necessity of regulating emergency procedures and capacities. It carries similar gravitas as a war film. At the 25th anniversary of the film, I can appreciate how Titanic has impacted movies made later.  What I didn't: So here's the thing. I feel very bad for you if you died in the sinking of the Titanic. I feel less bad for you if you managed to get on a lifeboat on the Titanic and then decided to get off. I question all of your decision making and priorities if you decide to get off a...

Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them Reveiw

What I liked: For a movie based on what is in essence a fictional encyclopedia, this movie has a surprising amount of plot. Not great plot, but more than I usually get from reading an alphabetical reference book. I liked the dopey sidekick, his facial expressions were great and he was the only one who acknowledged that what happening on screen was not actually normal. I liked that the president led the tiny army of US wizards to their tiny battle in a subway. So as military victories go, this was not one for the history books, for many reasons. But it did lend more meaning to the phrase Commander in Chief. I felt like Dr Who was once again a bow tie wearing socially awkward guy who lives in a box that is bigger on the inside. Some of the creatures were cool but the CGI didn't quite make them alive. I liked the sloth monkey, I don't really know who it was or what it was doing but I would support a slothmonkey planet of the apes crossover. I like that the guy from SWAT has fina...

Free Guy

What I liked: I liked Guy. That is in fact the point but I like how happy, carefree, and wholesome he is in what is essentially Grand Theft Auto. I like what the NPCs decide to focus on as they achieve consciousness. I liked the ridiculous YouTubers getting all philosophical about Guy and how he radically changed game play. I liked that so much of the game economy was about silly skins, just like a real game, and how that completely confused the NPCs. I liked the fight between Dude and Guy and its resolution, it managed to stay very on theme. The item cameos were fun, like seeing the Portal gun, or the Fortnite piƱata. I liked guy finding the med kit and building up an inventory.  What I didn't: I am not be a lawyer but I am suspicious that there maybe more efficient ways of obtaining evidence of copyright violation than playing 12 hours of a computer game every day. With that in mind I think the evidence points to the heroine enjoying the game far more than she lets on. On the top...