Skip to main content

Minions Review




What I liked: I think my favorite part of the movie was the opening showing the villains the minions have worked for throughout history. Unfortunately most of this was included in the trailer, but it was still funny. The other part I liked was when the mad scientist is giving the minions their gadgets for the upcoming heist. I think it is essentially the same scene as Muppets from Space, or really Oceans 11-13 or any other heist movie, but involving minions, and ridiculous ‘60s talk. That’s pretty much it. There were a few moments of parody or slap stick that landed well but those two scenes were about the best the movie had to offer, except one line describing the minion as “a small, bald, jaundiced child”.  Mostly I’m just glad that it was a double feature with inside out, otherwise I would have been really disappointed with the evening.
What I didn’t: The most tragic thing about this movie, besides that I went to see it in a theater, is that the minion chaos has been lost. If you recall from the other two Despicable installments, Minions are maddness. We are never quite sure why Gru has them. Possibly it is a sign of his ineptness at being a villain; maybe it is an indication of his good heart that he loves absurd cuddly creatures. Whatever the reason, Minions clearly do more harm than good and their antics are chaotic and comical. This has been destroyed. They have a purpose. There is a goal (and, far worse, since it is a childrens Hollywood movie, we already know the goal is accomplished). There is semi-rational thought. There is attempted character development. What was once a wonderful instrument of mayhem, to allies by misadventure, to enemies by sheer chance, has been harnessed and so loses its charm. Unfortunately, all the character development and creativity this movie had to offer was misdirected towards the undevelopable minions. This leaves our super villain, Scarlet Overkill, sadly flat, empty, boring, and unevil. There was potential for all varieties of villain: bumbling and inept like Gru or Megamind, delightfully evil and destructive like Darth Vader, actually evil and effective like no super villain in history. None of these were selected. Apparently, no plan at all was contrived. She oscillates between coercive like Gothel in Tangled, absolutely useless mastermind like Ocean in Ocean’s 11, and sob story gag gag villain like most times people try to give a villain a backstory. There are no moments of devilish plotting, instead we get some stilted speech about women can be super villains too. Which could have carried some kind of forced weight if her whole goal was not to become a frilly princess.
Who should watch this: probably very small children who resemble minions themselves

Would I watch it again? Nope.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Titanic

What I liked: Liked is definitely the wrong word for it but the scenes of the sinking of the Titanic were masterful. They were technologically impressive, apparently remarkably accurate, and emotionally gripping. The variety of ways in which different people dealt with a completely hopeless situation was both touching and thought provoking. Especially beautiful was the string quartet. In isolation from the love story, the sinking of the Titanic is a tragic reminder of the cost of hubris and the necessity of regulating emergency procedures and capacities. It carries similar gravitas as a war film. At the 25th anniversary of the film, I can appreciate how Titanic has impacted movies made later.  What I didn't: So here's the thing. I feel very bad for you if you died in the sinking of the Titanic. I feel less bad for you if you managed to get on a lifeboat on the Titanic and then decided to get off. I question all of your decision making and priorities if you decide to get off a...

Mrs Harris goes to Paris

What I liked: This is a happy movie. I liked the dresses and especially how very happy seeing all of the dresses made Mrs Harris. I liked how her enthusiasm wins over the tailor and almost everyone else. Mrs Harris was so delighted with Paris and the people she met that she motivated them to live just a little more enthusiastically and optimistically. From the philosophical model, to the intellectual accountant, to the withdrawn Marquis and the cold director the characters were all imaginatively Parisian (assuming your an American author in the 1950s). I liked that they drove a vespa. I was glad that while Mrs Harris got a fresh view of the world and had a wonderful time in Paris, they steered clear of the potential cliche plot pot holes they could have fallen in. I especially liked her friends who helped her live her dream of going to Paris to buy a dress while really not understanding it at all.  What I didn't: Mrs Harris did such a great job agitating in Paris she really could h...

See how the run

What I liked: I liked how very enthusiastic the sergeant was. And I appreciated that, remarkably, both the senior detective and the assistant were competent. It seems like usually this is a one or the other kind of pairing so I lament the partnership that inevitably formed somewhere else in the department of two incompetent officers. The story boarding was very fun and it was very clear that the director in the film had never seen nor heard anything about The Mousetrap. I liked the recurring snow shovel. For the second time in as many months the detectives were using the means, motive, opportunity chart for the suspects. Still no sign of a murderer using one though.   What I didn't: Why after you take a tumble through a cake and a pile of shellfish would you go find a replacement outfit in the costume department of the theater instead of just going back to your house? I mean I might enjoy that, you could come back to the party dressed as Henry VIII, or a demigorgon, or a tree....