Skip to main content

K19 Widowmaker Review




What I liked: K-19 was made by National Geographic so falls in the very very small genre of awesome dramatized almost documentary thing. Going it to the movie I did not know the story of the submarine and so foolishly assumed that the widowmaker would be attacking other boats. Actually this boat was the embodiment of Murphy’s Law: Launched too soon, this early model nuclear sub encountered every disaster possible. Unbelievably, according to the internet nearly all of the incidents actually happened. Also surprising, it is entirely believable in contrast to the series of disasters encountered by U-574. While I was not particularly invested in any of the characters their plight was compellingly pitiful. And despite my feelings about the characters, I felt like their interactions with each other were convincing and engaging. I really liked the epilogue, the acting was better and I was impressed with the old person makeup. I thought that the acting was the best and As a submarine movie this naturally stacks up against U-574 and Hunt for the Red October. In that comparison, this movie achieves with flying colors everything that U-574 aspired to. There is patriotism and compromise, there is disaster and self sacrifice there are submarines. All are done better in this movie. K-19 is the Hunt for the Red October if there really were  a terrible accident instead of a defecting naval officer. This makes it darker, sadder, and actually more stressful. It is an almost documentary so actually they could all die, whereas we all know that Jack Ryan will always win.
What I didn’t: The accents. They are Russian, presumably speaking Russian. They would not have Russian accents. Plus the actors, especially Harrison Ford, are inconsistent and bad at the accent. Radiation Sickness, this is now my number 1 reason for never wanting to work on a submarine (the previous reason was hull breaches followed by enclosed spaces and no windows). I can’t really say that the nuclear reactor should have had no effect on the people since that would be both historically and scientifically inaccurate, but it does make my skin crawl which reminds me to be grateful that my skin is still attached. For a film made by National Geographic there were disappointingly few wide angle beautiful scenery shots. I feel like the movie should have lived up to the name of the producer and delivered cool filmography of the the glaciers or the ocean or something. I found the captain’s character confusing he starts off like the coach in almost every sports movie, push the team until the break because then they will be able to perform under any pressure. Then transitions to and egotistical maniac. Finally, inexplicably, coming to rest on the harsh but loving father figure. All the personality shifts seemed very sudden. Ra’s al Guhl was the executive officer on the submarine, I couldn’t help feeling that this did not bode well for civilization.
Who should watch this: Not anyone who will work closely with radioactivity, or for the Russians, or in enclosed spaces. I think it is a very good accompaniment to Hunt for the Red October.
Would I watch it again? I would have to be in the right mood. It was exciting the first time but would probably be less so a second time.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Titanic

What I liked: Liked is definitely the wrong word for it but the scenes of the sinking of the Titanic were masterful. They were technologically impressive, apparently remarkably accurate, and emotionally gripping. The variety of ways in which different people dealt with a completely hopeless situation was both touching and thought provoking. Especially beautiful was the string quartet. In isolation from the love story, the sinking of the Titanic is a tragic reminder of the cost of hubris and the necessity of regulating emergency procedures and capacities. It carries similar gravitas as a war film. At the 25th anniversary of the film, I can appreciate how Titanic has impacted movies made later.  What I didn't: So here's the thing. I feel very bad for you if you died in the sinking of the Titanic. I feel less bad for you if you managed to get on a lifeboat on the Titanic and then decided to get off. I question all of your decision making and priorities if you decide to get off a...
Post a Comment
Read more

Annihilation

  What I liked: I liked the crystal trees and the creepy people plants. The multi colored lichen and flowers were cool too. I liked how disorienting the loss of time and flashbacks were, they did a good job of maintaining the disquiet and suspense. I liked that they remembered that mutation and evolution has no goal, it's just a thing that happens with all kinds of side effects. I liked their little boat trip in giant crocodile infested swamp. I'm not sure if I loved the silver skin suit but I can't deny that it was interesting.  What I didn't: The heroes are all scientists who go on a mission to find out what is going on inside the "shimmer". For being all scientists they don't draw very well on their test one variable at a time training. If nothing has ever come out of the shimmer, try sticking a stick in and see if you can pull it out. Step inside with a harness on so if you don't come back they can try and pull you back. Walk in a little ways and t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Vengeance

What I liked: The premise is absurd. A complete dumpster fire of a person from New York teams up with a Texan red neck to avenge the death of the sister. ... by making a podcast. If that approach to revenge is not the most terrible revenge plan I'm not sure what is. Oh wait, it's Dracula kidnapping a historian to catalog his personal book collection, but that is off topic. Along they way the character gets wildly out of his depth and does things that are definitely bad plans. Like meet with a cartel leader alone in a shed, drive a Prius, visit a music producer, more than once, and give an off the cuff eulogy. Certainly at the beginning it carries the awkward discomfort of The Office but it quickly expands to explosions and the conviction to a podcast found only among the certain portion of the coffee shop population. I thought they did a good job of picking fun at both the rural Texans and the big city New Yorkers. I think they really nailed the "intellectual" bros in...
Post a Comment
Read more