Skip to main content

Imitation Game Review



    What I liked: I liked the lady on the code cracking team. She was fun and spunky. I think Cumberbatch did a good job portraying Turing with all his really odd personality traits. Actually, I think the whole core cast did a very good job being believable little dweebs completely convinced of their own brilliance and dedicated to proving it. I laughed several times at the exchanges that he had with other people in the film. I liked the behemoth of the thinking machine. I liked the clips from famous speeches inserted into the film. Maybe it is because I visited the Churchill museum this year but I thought it was cool to hear from the good old prime minister. I liked the director of MI6; he wasn’t M but still fairly acceptable. “You are suggesting conspiracy at the highest levels of government!... sounds like exactly my kind of thing.” I liked the bonfire. I did some fact checking on the movie and actually most of it was exceptionally sound. I actually discovered that there was more significance to all of the running scenes than just Turing being stressed and running. It turns out that he would routinely run 40 miles in to London to attend high level briefings and he was almost fast enough to qualify for the Olympics.
    What I didn’t: I didn’t like the plot structure. It took me a while to figure out that the police investigation was not concurrent with WWII. I kept expecting MI6 to come swooping in to block the local police force. It turns out that that was actually about 10 years later, so England was not actually in danger. I also didn’t like that they made it seem like there was no progress being made until the very end. Yes breaking the code was of course the most important development but there was incremental progress leading up to it. Yes Turing was obsessed and driven but probably not actually insane.
    Who should watch this: It is a pretty good piece about scientists and engineers being the heroes and about making hard decisions. 
    Would I watch it again? I’m glad I watched it. I might again.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Titanic

What I liked: Liked is definitely the wrong word for it but the scenes of the sinking of the Titanic were masterful. They were technologically impressive, apparently remarkably accurate, and emotionally gripping. The variety of ways in which different people dealt with a completely hopeless situation was both touching and thought provoking. Especially beautiful was the string quartet. In isolation from the love story, the sinking of the Titanic is a tragic reminder of the cost of hubris and the necessity of regulating emergency procedures and capacities. It carries similar gravitas as a war film. At the 25th anniversary of the film, I can appreciate how Titanic has impacted movies made later.  What I didn't: So here's the thing. I feel very bad for you if you died in the sinking of the Titanic. I feel less bad for you if you managed to get on a lifeboat on the Titanic and then decided to get off. I question all of your decision making and priorities if you decide to get off a...

Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them Reveiw

What I liked: For a movie based on what is in essence a fictional encyclopedia, this movie has a surprising amount of plot. Not great plot, but more than I usually get from reading an alphabetical reference book. I liked the dopey sidekick, his facial expressions were great and he was the only one who acknowledged that what happening on screen was not actually normal. I liked that the president led the tiny army of US wizards to their tiny battle in a subway. So as military victories go, this was not one for the history books, for many reasons. But it did lend more meaning to the phrase Commander in Chief. I felt like Dr Who was once again a bow tie wearing socially awkward guy who lives in a box that is bigger on the inside. Some of the creatures were cool but the CGI didn't quite make them alive. I liked the sloth monkey, I don't really know who it was or what it was doing but I would support a slothmonkey planet of the apes crossover. I like that the guy from SWAT has fina...

Clear and Present Danger Review

What I liked: it's the Jack Ryan character, he's pretty cool. That's really all this movie has going for it. Oh and the old school hacking. That was fun. What I didn't: it was boring. Boring boring. It took me three sessions to get through it. If I turn on a movie while folding laundry or grading, it has a good 30-45 minutes to get me interested enough to keep watching, that should be more than enough to get past the plot set up to the for stuff. If a film can't grab me in that time, there is a problem. Blah blah evil president, corrupt spies, bad guys. Been there, seen that done better. Also this is medium in Ryan's career, he is acting director of the CIA, should he really be running around asking under machine gun fire? I mean I like me some good explosions but maybe after all this time in  the CIA he would have meet at least one friend who is trustworthy and could come on adventures with him. If there is no other trustworthy decent agent in the CIA...