Skip to main content

Hunger Games 4 Review



   What I liked: I liked the rolly polly backpacks. I don’t really know that they had a purpose or would have been very good at whatever that purpose was, but they looked pretty cool. I liked the tiger lady’s afro. I liked that the main characters thought that effective disguises would be wearing cloaks with hoods. I mean can’t you even try the token haircut that all spies do? I like that despite the full blown war, oil spill, zombie apocalypse, lasers, and localized earthquake the subway system still seems to run with remarkable punctuality. I did really like that no one was fooled by Catnis’ terrible lying. “I have to tell you that I lied” “Yes we all know and have known the entire time” “really? I thought I was convincing.” “No, no you were not” I liked that some of the people that I was watching with were fooled by Catnis and the evil plots. Clearly they don’t watch enough spy movies.
    What I didn’t:  Before I get into the characters, plot, etc. a note on the filming. I have no idea who most of the characters were. They acted like I should remember them, I didn't. It's been a year since the last one and some of them are bald now. Even if I did know when they are all wet running from various bad things with fast cutting, I can't tell who just died. Also she never wore the outfit in this poster, what's up with that? As I may have mentioned in a previous review these different organizations have possibly the worst plans for running a war. I do have to admit that the Capital showed remarkable commitment to the cause. Most countries dedicate large amounts or resources to an active war but these resources usually go into fueling vehicles, building things, and outfitting the army. Not the Capital, no, the requisition what must be a full tanker of oil for the sole purpose of flooding a city block. Where did it come from? How was it stored? How did they pump it back out again? Clearly they devoted huge amounts of time, engineering, and raw materials to a completely useless scheme. The rest of their infrastructure was equally puzzling. Just one example: despite being set in an alternate future, the elaborate sewer system was designed like one from the 1800s with large walkable passages. This is 1) a huge waste of space 2) a waste of energy to build something larger than needed 3) a terrible plan for smell control. One of the comments about Jurassic World was you should never release velociraptors without a really good plan of how to get them back in their cage. I feel like this should apply to weird toothy zombies and like to think that this oversight led to a smooth transition from one postapocalyptic scenario to another. Don’t think the rebels had better plans. Any time your approach of choice is deploying a 16 year old with a bow and arrow instead of the football stadium sized arsenal you have been accumulating for 75 years, it is time to reevaluate your decision making paradigm. (note I am not advocating actually using a football stadium as a weapon, that was clearly a terrible plan when Magnito tried it). Also if your enemy is using their very cool and highly efficient subway system to rapidly transport soldiers across the city, your first order of business should probably be to either incapacitate said system or take control of it. There are many reasonable methods of government in the world; there are even unreasonable but acceptable methods of government. None of these involve a council of gladiators who haven’t actually died yet especially when there are actual official representatives with leadership experience. Not even Rome did that and they were the ones who invented gladiators. Finally, who decided that the best way to help someone overcome traumatic loss is to send them back to an empty house in a destroyed all alone? This makes no sense unless you are trying to prepare them for the imminent zombie apocalypse.
    Who should watch this: Well it is the end of the series, so if you value the author’s opinion on what happens to the plot and characters you should watch it. If you are creative you can probably come up with something better.
    Would I watch it again? No, it wasn’t even as much fun to shout at as the other ones.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ready Player One Review

What I liked: I bet all of the developers loved making this film, I saw so many video game and movie references in the background of scenes. I bet all the developers just inserted their favorites like the ninja turtles, a whole platoon of halo soldiers, and orcs. That it was a video game made it possible and exciting to have all kinds of absolutely random physics and logic defying things happen. Obviously, I loved the T. Rex and who would not enjoy seeing Mechagodzilla or a cyborg orc driving a monster truck? Early in the movie they made good use of the video game architecture in a way that reminded me a bit of secret rooms in super mario. The characters visit the world of the Shining, which was amazing and hilarious. I loved the variety of characters, vehicles and weapons that we get to see and it is more fun (at least for me) that they draw from more than strictly the 1980's. I also really liked the music, for the most part the selections were great for the scenes. The book was

Solo Reveiw

What I liked: The architecture of a heist movie has 4 stages: stage 1 explain how hard the job is, stage 2 come up with a ridiculously elaborate plan to accomplish the job and acquire hard to find equipment, stage 3 execute the plan but something goes terribly wrong, stage 4 sneaky twist and huge pay off. The Solo movie takes the bold move of streamlining the first two and a half steps, picking up with stage 3.5 "Something goes terribly wrong". This saves everyone the slow wind up to the actual action. This saved time translates into a movie with not one but all the heists. We have grand theft, customs evasion, train robbery, vault robbery, the classic hustle, and of course smuggling. I guess they may have tried to crowd too a little much in because they also almost always skip stage 4. This stage skipping also means that we don't know if the things they are doing are actually hard or they are just incompetent. I'm surprised more heist movies don't explore this

Wrinkle in Time Review

What I liked: I liked Charles Wallace, that kid was funny. I liked that the ladies in crazy dresses were warriors and that the kids were warriors too. You know me I'm all about a good action movie with awesome fighting, but I liked that at least in this universe the defining characteristics of warriors were compassion, kindness, and love. Similarly, I liked that the bad guys weren't launching a massive military conquest of the universe, I mean everyone is doing that these days. Surprisingly, I liked the Mrs's dresses. They were crazy and over the top but it was fun that they changed with every teleportation and that they were completely absurd. The outfits were rather like the Mrs's wearing them, over the top and fantastical. Knowing all of them from other shows I may have had some unfulfilled expectations. At no point did anyone say "You get a wrinkle, and you get a wrinkle, Everyone gets a wrinkle!" which I must admit was a little disappointing. I also think