Skip to main content

Magnificent 7 Review

What I liked: All the gun slingers are ridiculous larger than life characters. Most of them were pretty fun and I think the actors probably had fun with the parts. And despite them all being ridiculous, I was pretty sold on the idea that if you wanted to raise a tiny mercenary army in the old west, this is probably about what you would come up with. For having a large number of principle characters and little time to spend on each of them, they did a good job of giving them personalities and interesting guessed at backstories. I liked the traps the good guys set and the explosions. The comic timing was pretty on point. It felt like an old western. Granted I haven't seen that many: Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, Shoot out at the OK Corral, Man from Snowy River (yes I know that one is Australian but I need to pad my numbers), Rango (too far?). To me the shots, plot, and characters seemed to fit into the Old Hollywood version of the wild west. The soundtrack was good. It would be interesting to watch the same long shots of people on horses with different music, I bet it could easily be recast as relaxing, fun, or even romantic instead of dramatics with the right music.

What I didn't: While I have lingering confusion about the role of a sheriff in the old west, my major concerns are in the town people's battle preparation plan. Apparently this town has a high frequency of gun fights. Shouldn't they come up with a better bystander protection program than hiding in buildings with wood siding? Remember how bullets go through that, even if you didn't know that we get to see it enough in the movie that you should probably know that by the end of the film. So really they should invest in some metal siding or a bunker. I would also be completely satisfied with the run for the hills approach where you run up over the ridge line to be protected by the huge mound of dirt. Acceptable plans do not include leaving all livestock in pens in the middle of the town (they conceded the element of surprise, which might justify this tactic, when they invited the bad guy to the gun fight), waiting until the last minute to have anyone hide, and only hiding people in what appears to be a very flammable half underground cellar. Also if dynamite is fair game, they really could have had more optimal positioning of the charges. I am also a little confused about the number of people in the town. There were about 100 people in the church at the beginning, there were about 30 people in the cellar, about 500 town people died in the shoot out, and there were about 1,000 people in the town at the end. Clearly this town has a serious immigration imbalance. Or they are setting up a zombie cowboy sequel. There were some cringe worthy deaths. The final Indian knife dual was kind of weird, it felt obligatory and they either should have made it cooler if they wanted to keep it or just skipped it. The movie experimented a little with trying to make the church a central part of the cowboy community; some things they tried worked some did not. I didn't like having the gun fight resolve in the church.

Who should watch this? It earns the PG13, it isn't graphic but some of the deaths are...crunchy, main characters die, and the bad guys are well and truly bad. I think the main draws would be people who like westerns and people who want to see a lot of horses and some impressive shots of lots of horses.

Would I watch it again?  It was fun to see it with my friends, I doubt I'll rewatch it.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Titanic

What I liked: Liked is definitely the wrong word for it but the scenes of the sinking of the Titanic were masterful. They were technologically impressive, apparently remarkably accurate, and emotionally gripping. The variety of ways in which different people dealt with a completely hopeless situation was both touching and thought provoking. Especially beautiful was the string quartet. In isolation from the love story, the sinking of the Titanic is a tragic reminder of the cost of hubris and the necessity of regulating emergency procedures and capacities. It carries similar gravitas as a war film. At the 25th anniversary of the film, I can appreciate how Titanic has impacted movies made later.  What I didn't: So here's the thing. I feel very bad for you if you died in the sinking of the Titanic. I feel less bad for you if you managed to get on a lifeboat on the Titanic and then decided to get off. I question all of your decision making and priorities if you decide to get off a...
Post a Comment
Read more

Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them Reveiw

What I liked: For a movie based on what is in essence a fictional encyclopedia, this movie has a surprising amount of plot. Not great plot, but more than I usually get from reading an alphabetical reference book. I liked the dopey sidekick, his facial expressions were great and he was the only one who acknowledged that what happening on screen was not actually normal. I liked that the president led the tiny army of US wizards to their tiny battle in a subway. So as military victories go, this was not one for the history books, for many reasons. But it did lend more meaning to the phrase Commander in Chief. I felt like Dr Who was once again a bow tie wearing socially awkward guy who lives in a box that is bigger on the inside. Some of the creatures were cool but the CGI didn't quite make them alive. I liked the sloth monkey, I don't really know who it was or what it was doing but I would support a slothmonkey planet of the apes crossover. I like that the guy from SWAT has fina...
Post a Comment
Read more

Clear and Present Danger Review

What I liked: it's the Jack Ryan character, he's pretty cool. That's really all this movie has going for it. Oh and the old school hacking. That was fun. What I didn't: it was boring. Boring boring. It took me three sessions to get through it. If I turn on a movie while folding laundry or grading, it has a good 30-45 minutes to get me interested enough to keep watching, that should be more than enough to get past the plot set up to the for stuff. If a film can't grab me in that time, there is a problem. Blah blah evil president, corrupt spies, bad guys. Been there, seen that done better. Also this is medium in Ryan's career, he is acting director of the CIA, should he really be running around asking under machine gun fire? I mean I like me some good explosions but maybe after all this time in  the CIA he would have meet at least one friend who is trustworthy and could come on adventures with him. If there is no other trustworthy decent agent in the CIA...
Post a Comment
Read more