Skip to main content

Darkest Hour Review

What I liked: Winston Churchill is a fascinating leader who accomplished remarkable things in a very trying time. He was also stubborn and abrasive and had a whole slough of other personal failings. The film did a good job of capturing his skills as a leader, the gravity of the situation, and many of his odd quirks. I liked the actor who played Churchill, I think he did a great job. And I liked that they were able to work in as many of his ridiculous quotes as they did.  Normally I don’t like lots of extreme close ups in movies but they worked in this one. I like the War Rooms but more just because they are cool not necessarily because they are particularly well depicted in the movie. I like the reactions of the Londoners when they meed Churchill in the underground.  I like that between this movie, Kings Speech, and Dunkirk we have the initial phase of the UK’s involvement in WWII dramatized from three very different perspectives. Although it is a matter of record, I like that England did not surrender or get beaten in WWII.

What I didn’t: When the entire screen fills up with the date I get nervous. Why do we need a 20 foot tall 25 May? Every time it came up I did frantic memory checks from high school history to see if that particular date was significant. Ms Hoffstadter would be sadly disappointed in my recall skills. I don’t know who decorated Churchill’s bedroom but they did a terrible job. The rest of the house seemed to be fine but the best I could tell he slept in the part of the basement where they stored old broken stuff. I wanted to see the RAF pull bombers across the Canadian border with horses. If you bring something like that up you are obligated to put it on screen. I’m getting conflicting etiquette directives from the Crown and this movie. I would like definitive clarification about when (if ever) it is acceptable to sit in the presence of royalty, because, you know, I plan on doing that a lot in the near future. The famous, we will fight on the beaches and the landing grounds speech was well delivered and moving but I will I thought the delivery in Dunkirk was more moving. (I may or may not have had a back to back of those two movies. It’s really really cold out. Don’t judge)

Who should watch this? WWII buffs, people who like Winston Churchill (those two may be largely overlapping populations), people who like movies with lots of political posturing, people who like war movies but have an aversion to shooting and bodies, people who like historical dramas.

Would I watch it again? Yes, but I would probably not do a double feature again, that was a bit much.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Titanic

What I liked: Liked is definitely the wrong word for it but the scenes of the sinking of the Titanic were masterful. They were technologically impressive, apparently remarkably accurate, and emotionally gripping. The variety of ways in which different people dealt with a completely hopeless situation was both touching and thought provoking. Especially beautiful was the string quartet. In isolation from the love story, the sinking of the Titanic is a tragic reminder of the cost of hubris and the necessity of regulating emergency procedures and capacities. It carries similar gravitas as a war film. At the 25th anniversary of the film, I can appreciate how Titanic has impacted movies made later.  What I didn't: So here's the thing. I feel very bad for you if you died in the sinking of the Titanic. I feel less bad for you if you managed to get on a lifeboat on the Titanic and then decided to get off. I question all of your decision making and priorities if you decide to get off a...
Post a Comment
Read more

Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them Reveiw

What I liked: For a movie based on what is in essence a fictional encyclopedia, this movie has a surprising amount of plot. Not great plot, but more than I usually get from reading an alphabetical reference book. I liked the dopey sidekick, his facial expressions were great and he was the only one who acknowledged that what happening on screen was not actually normal. I liked that the president led the tiny army of US wizards to their tiny battle in a subway. So as military victories go, this was not one for the history books, for many reasons. But it did lend more meaning to the phrase Commander in Chief. I felt like Dr Who was once again a bow tie wearing socially awkward guy who lives in a box that is bigger on the inside. Some of the creatures were cool but the CGI didn't quite make them alive. I liked the sloth monkey, I don't really know who it was or what it was doing but I would support a slothmonkey planet of the apes crossover. I like that the guy from SWAT has fina...
Post a Comment
Read more

Annihilation

  What I liked: I liked the crystal trees and the creepy people plants. The multi colored lichen and flowers were cool too. I liked how disorienting the loss of time and flashbacks were, they did a good job of maintaining the disquiet and suspense. I liked that they remembered that mutation and evolution has no goal, it's just a thing that happens with all kinds of side effects. I liked their little boat trip in giant crocodile infested swamp. I'm not sure if I loved the silver skin suit but I can't deny that it was interesting.  What I didn't: The heroes are all scientists who go on a mission to find out what is going on inside the "shimmer". For being all scientists they don't draw very well on their test one variable at a time training. If nothing has ever come out of the shimmer, try sticking a stick in and see if you can pull it out. Step inside with a harness on so if you don't come back they can try and pull you back. Walk in a little ways and t...
Post a Comment
Read more