Skip to main content

Jurassic Park V Review (Jurassic World Fallen Kingdom)

What I liked: There was a lot to like about this movie, mostly owing to the fact that it starred a lot of dinosaurs. I mean we got dinosaurs and a volcano, what else could you want in life? I liked the variety of dinosaurs that we got to see. There was the dinosaur with a nose the perfect size to fit in a fire escape. There was the dinosaur that seemed to be living in a sealed tunnel. There was the dinosaur that plays possum and the dinosaur that is brand new and some dinosaurs from Australia. I really liked the scene with the dinosaurs running from the volcano. I kind of wish this was the whole movie. The lava was fast, the dinosaurs were fast, and shockingly the people were just as fast. I was particularly impressed that while running from lava, the dinosaurs took the time to try to eat the people and each other. It was also fortunate that the clouds of ash did not instantly Pompeii the dinosaurs. The dinosaur evacuation was a very impressive feat. I really want to know how they got the very upset dinosaurs into helicopter harnesses. I would also like to know how they fit the big sauropod into the boat. I'm sure everyone will be glad to know the limb motif from the original Jurassic park is back. We have arms and legs hanging out just to make sure we know the dinosaur ate something. Another good thing back from the original is the music, one of my favorite theme songs, and now we have it in every key so you can play minor dinosaur music when you are feeling sad. I can't decide if I should be deeply impressed or profoundly concerned with the construction of the mansion. The library roof is a masterpiece of engineering for its stability, but the basement seems particularly unstable. And how is there a loading dock in the sub sub sub basement? Why would you install a dumbwaiter that goes to every floor including the very secret sub sub sub basement. I also feel like there are some major security flaws in the mansion. You know, besides the dinosaurs. I do have to acknowledge that this Jurassic Park tries to ask real questions about implications of the dinosaur science. In that it does try and reach beyond what the other Jurassic park sequels have done. It would have been more successful at posing those questions if the plan were not so deeply flawed.

What I didn't: Let's start with the most glaring problem with the "let's save the dinosaurs from extinction" plan. The dinosaurs are specifically designed to not reproduce. Yes I'm aware of the famous "Life finds a way" concept, but it will be particularly hard pressed because the people seem to only plan on saving one of each species. Now I know boat space is limited, but Noah worked it out and so can you. Speaking of Noah the lone dinosaur is sad. Overly dramatic. But sad. Anyway the plan would have more traction if the dinosaurs were not intended for extinction since their creation. And since they can make dinosaurs at any time, probably the most efficient way to save all the dinosaurs would be to save the one freezer with the dinosaur samples in it. Unless the sequences have already been digitized. Then you don't even have to go to the island at all. If you are going to go to Jurassic park with a terrible terrible plan, don't go during a storm. I thought we had all already learned that. Also while you are there do not open the largest doors. Those doors should remain closed. Go through the cute person sized doors. And close them behind you. Having sent expeditions to this island 4 times before this, you should really stock some guns with dinosaur stopping caliber. Bad guys should really work out their priorities. If they are willing to callously murder people that should probably extend to main characters. I didn't like the sidekicks, they were just too caricatured. They each had some good lines but didn't really add anything. I wish there had been more practical effects. I was hoping for a bit more dinosaur trivia in the movie. There was one moment when a businessman is listing off dinosaur specifications like length, weight and number of teeth. I was really hoping we were in for a several minute curtain call for each dinosaur. Kind of like a Nova segment, but with better background music. Sadly, we only got details on one dinosaur, and it wasn't even one of the leads. Also not only do we not know the dinosaur facts, but the makers of the movie don't know the dinosaur facts. Like dinosaurs can swim and my favorite example: the mosasaur. A mosasaur is supposed to be about 50 feet long, so about the size of a school bus or an average helicopter. Giant and terrifying. Now look at this promotional picture of a mosasaur. I may not have taken comparative anatomy, but I have an inkling that if you are the size of a helicopter, your mouth cannot also be the size of a helicopter. Unless you are a sarcastic fringehead (freaky looking fish. Look it up I'll wait). The writers may also have some understanding gaps when it comes to blood transfusions and genetics. I am left the film with a number of unanswered questions. Why do they have a giant vat of cyanide? Couldn't cyanide be detrimental to things besides dinosaurs, like maybe people? Where was the coastguard? Since Jurassic Park II the whole dinosaur thing should really be on their radar. Literally. Why do people keep climbing in cages with dinosaurs? To quote another Jurassic Park "that is the worst idea in the long sad history of bad ideas". Why would anyone ever assume a dinosaur is dead? Who is Iris? Where is Iris? And one better, Why is Iris? Finally, now knowing that Farmer Hoggett was one of the master minds of Jurassic Park I have a lot of unanswered questions about Babe.

Who should watch this? People who love dinosaurs, people who love volcanoes, people who love watching dinosaurs run from volcanoes.

Would I watch it again? I will probably watch the dinosaur running scene several times.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Titanic

What I liked: Liked is definitely the wrong word for it but the scenes of the sinking of the Titanic were masterful. They were technologically impressive, apparently remarkably accurate, and emotionally gripping. The variety of ways in which different people dealt with a completely hopeless situation was both touching and thought provoking. Especially beautiful was the string quartet. In isolation from the love story, the sinking of the Titanic is a tragic reminder of the cost of hubris and the necessity of regulating emergency procedures and capacities. It carries similar gravitas as a war film. At the 25th anniversary of the film, I can appreciate how Titanic has impacted movies made later.  What I didn't: So here's the thing. I feel very bad for you if you died in the sinking of the Titanic. I feel less bad for you if you managed to get on a lifeboat on the Titanic and then decided to get off. I question all of your decision making and priorities if you decide to get off a...

Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them Reveiw

What I liked: For a movie based on what is in essence a fictional encyclopedia, this movie has a surprising amount of plot. Not great plot, but more than I usually get from reading an alphabetical reference book. I liked the dopey sidekick, his facial expressions were great and he was the only one who acknowledged that what happening on screen was not actually normal. I liked that the president led the tiny army of US wizards to their tiny battle in a subway. So as military victories go, this was not one for the history books, for many reasons. But it did lend more meaning to the phrase Commander in Chief. I felt like Dr Who was once again a bow tie wearing socially awkward guy who lives in a box that is bigger on the inside. Some of the creatures were cool but the CGI didn't quite make them alive. I liked the sloth monkey, I don't really know who it was or what it was doing but I would support a slothmonkey planet of the apes crossover. I like that the guy from SWAT has fina...

Clear and Present Danger Review

What I liked: it's the Jack Ryan character, he's pretty cool. That's really all this movie has going for it. Oh and the old school hacking. That was fun. What I didn't: it was boring. Boring boring. It took me three sessions to get through it. If I turn on a movie while folding laundry or grading, it has a good 30-45 minutes to get me interested enough to keep watching, that should be more than enough to get past the plot set up to the for stuff. If a film can't grab me in that time, there is a problem. Blah blah evil president, corrupt spies, bad guys. Been there, seen that done better. Also this is medium in Ryan's career, he is acting director of the CIA, should he really be running around asking under machine gun fire? I mean I like me some good explosions but maybe after all this time in  the CIA he would have meet at least one friend who is trustworthy and could come on adventures with him. If there is no other trustworthy decent agent in the CIA...