Skip to main content

Rear Window Review

What I liked: This is the moment we have all been waiting for. After mistakenly watching the Christopher Reeves version and a 2000's remake, I have finally watched Alfred Hitchcock's Rear Window. In some ways it really delivered. Others I felt like I had seen before. I really liked the girl friend's outfits. Granted she is a model, but I thought they looked like things I would like to wear when the vintage mood strikes. The crotchety nurse was funny and delivered some pretty sarcastic lines for the 1950's.The film is based on a book "It had to be murder" but the catchier title comes up when the nurse declares that she is not an expert in rear window ethics (I figured this out myself, take that internet).  I appreciated the creative use of flash photography and, true to form, Hitchcock really shone in the exceptional development of side characters we see only briefly. I liked the makeshift dog elevator and the flowerbed misdirection. I must also credit Hitchcock for creating the original which other two films drew on heavily, in some scenes shot for shot.

What I didn't: Each of the Rear Window retellings has it's own side plot. For the 2000's one it's a teenage romance, for Reeve's it's his enduring faith in stem cell therapy (sorry it's been 20 years and we are still waiting), for Hitchcock it's an ill fated love story. While I just dismissed the other side plots, I was actively rooting for Jimmy Stewart and Grace Kelly's the relationship to end because I thought he was a jerk. So, I was actively more annoyed every time we detoured from the mystery than I was with the other adaptations. I think due to the FCC regulations in the 50's Hitchcock's mystery gets tied up pretty tightly. Not as tight as Disturbia with the oh so subtle body lake, but certainly tighter than the Reeves version which leaves tantalizing loose ends.  I can't believe I'm saying it but the master of suspense gets out suspensed in the dramatic climax by the Reeves version. Maybe because of a more extensive set, maybe because I already knew what would happen by the time I got to Hitchcock, or maybe because of a 400% increase in non-functional limbs, I was more much more concerned about the fate of Reeves and his friends than I was about Jimmy Stewart. Last of all, I found out that the struggling song maker in the film was the musician in real life who went on to create Alvin and the Chipmunks. So all of you who dis like the high-pitched vocals of singing rodents, maybe you can blame the success of this Hitchcock version of Rear Window.

Who should watch this? People who love Hitchcock. People who like mysteries. Probably people who don't already know the ending.

Would I watch it again? I feel like I already have. Twice.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ready Player One Review

What I liked: I bet all of the developers loved making this film, I saw so many video game and movie references in the background of scenes. I bet all the developers just inserted their favorites like the ninja turtles, a whole platoon of halo soldiers, and orcs. That it was a video game made it possible and exciting to have all kinds of absolutely random physics and logic defying things happen. Obviously, I loved the T. Rex and who would not enjoy seeing Mechagodzilla or a cyborg orc driving a monster truck? Early in the movie they made good use of the video game architecture in a way that reminded me a bit of secret rooms in super mario. The characters visit the world of the Shining, which was amazing and hilarious. I loved the variety of characters, vehicles and weapons that we get to see and it is more fun (at least for me) that they draw from more than strictly the 1980's. I also really liked the music, for the most part the selections were great for the scenes. The book was...
3 comments
Read more

Solo Reveiw

What I liked: The architecture of a heist movie has 4 stages: stage 1 explain how hard the job is, stage 2 come up with a ridiculously elaborate plan to accomplish the job and acquire hard to find equipment, stage 3 execute the plan but something goes terribly wrong, stage 4 sneaky twist and huge pay off. The Solo movie takes the bold move of streamlining the first two and a half steps, picking up with stage 3.5 "Something goes terribly wrong". This saves everyone the slow wind up to the actual action. This saved time translates into a movie with not one but all the heists. We have grand theft, customs evasion, train robbery, vault robbery, the classic hustle, and of course smuggling. I guess they may have tried to crowd too a little much in because they also almost always skip stage 4. This stage skipping also means that we don't know if the things they are doing are actually hard or they are just incompetent. I'm surprised more heist movies don't explore this ...
2 comments
Read more

Wrinkle in Time Review

What I liked: I liked Charles Wallace, that kid was funny. I liked that the ladies in crazy dresses were warriors and that the kids were warriors too. You know me I'm all about a good action movie with awesome fighting, but I liked that at least in this universe the defining characteristics of warriors were compassion, kindness, and love. Similarly, I liked that the bad guys weren't launching a massive military conquest of the universe, I mean everyone is doing that these days. Surprisingly, I liked the Mrs's dresses. They were crazy and over the top but it was fun that they changed with every teleportation and that they were completely absurd. The outfits were rather like the Mrs's wearing them, over the top and fantastical. Knowing all of them from other shows I may have had some unfulfilled expectations. At no point did anyone say "You get a wrinkle, and you get a wrinkle, Everyone gets a wrinkle!" which I must admit was a little disappointing. I also think...
2 comments
Read more