Skip to main content

Rear Window Review

What I liked: This is the moment we have all been waiting for. After mistakenly watching the Christopher Reeves version and a 2000's remake, I have finally watched Alfred Hitchcock's Rear Window. In some ways it really delivered. Others I felt like I had seen before. I really liked the girl friend's outfits. Granted she is a model, but I thought they looked like things I would like to wear when the vintage mood strikes. The crotchety nurse was funny and delivered some pretty sarcastic lines for the 1950's.The film is based on a book "It had to be murder" but the catchier title comes up when the nurse declares that she is not an expert in rear window ethics (I figured this out myself, take that internet).  I appreciated the creative use of flash photography and, true to form, Hitchcock really shone in the exceptional development of side characters we see only briefly. I liked the makeshift dog elevator and the flowerbed misdirection. I must also credit Hitchcock for creating the original which other two films drew on heavily, in some scenes shot for shot.

What I didn't: Each of the Rear Window retellings has it's own side plot. For the 2000's one it's a teenage romance, for Reeve's it's his enduring faith in stem cell therapy (sorry it's been 20 years and we are still waiting), for Hitchcock it's an ill fated love story. While I just dismissed the other side plots, I was actively rooting for Jimmy Stewart and Grace Kelly's the relationship to end because I thought he was a jerk. So, I was actively more annoyed every time we detoured from the mystery than I was with the other adaptations. I think due to the FCC regulations in the 50's Hitchcock's mystery gets tied up pretty tightly. Not as tight as Disturbia with the oh so subtle body lake, but certainly tighter than the Reeves version which leaves tantalizing loose ends.  I can't believe I'm saying it but the master of suspense gets out suspensed in the dramatic climax by the Reeves version. Maybe because of a more extensive set, maybe because I already knew what would happen by the time I got to Hitchcock, or maybe because of a 400% increase in non-functional limbs, I was more much more concerned about the fate of Reeves and his friends than I was about Jimmy Stewart. Last of all, I found out that the struggling song maker in the film was the musician in real life who went on to create Alvin and the Chipmunks. So all of you who dis like the high-pitched vocals of singing rodents, maybe you can blame the success of this Hitchcock version of Rear Window.

Who should watch this? People who love Hitchcock. People who like mysteries. Probably people who don't already know the ending.

Would I watch it again? I feel like I already have. Twice.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Titanic

What I liked: Liked is definitely the wrong word for it but the scenes of the sinking of the Titanic were masterful. They were technologically impressive, apparently remarkably accurate, and emotionally gripping. The variety of ways in which different people dealt with a completely hopeless situation was both touching and thought provoking. Especially beautiful was the string quartet. In isolation from the love story, the sinking of the Titanic is a tragic reminder of the cost of hubris and the necessity of regulating emergency procedures and capacities. It carries similar gravitas as a war film. At the 25th anniversary of the film, I can appreciate how Titanic has impacted movies made later.  What I didn't: So here's the thing. I feel very bad for you if you died in the sinking of the Titanic. I feel less bad for you if you managed to get on a lifeboat on the Titanic and then decided to get off. I question all of your decision making and priorities if you decide to get off a...
Post a Comment
Read more

Free Guy

What I liked: I liked Guy. That is in fact the point but I like how happy, carefree, and wholesome he is in what is essentially Grand Theft Auto. I like what the NPCs decide to focus on as they achieve consciousness. I liked the ridiculous YouTubers getting all philosophical about Guy and how he radically changed game play. I liked that so much of the game economy was about silly skins, just like a real game, and how that completely confused the NPCs. I liked the fight between Dude and Guy and its resolution, it managed to stay very on theme. The item cameos were fun, like seeing the Portal gun, or the Fortnite piñata. I liked guy finding the med kit and building up an inventory.  What I didn't: I am not be a lawyer but I am suspicious that there maybe more efficient ways of obtaining evidence of copyright violation than playing 12 hours of a computer game every day. With that in mind I think the evidence points to the heroine enjoying the game far more than she lets on. On the top...
Post a Comment
Read more

Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them Reveiw

What I liked: For a movie based on what is in essence a fictional encyclopedia, this movie has a surprising amount of plot. Not great plot, but more than I usually get from reading an alphabetical reference book. I liked the dopey sidekick, his facial expressions were great and he was the only one who acknowledged that what happening on screen was not actually normal. I liked that the president led the tiny army of US wizards to their tiny battle in a subway. So as military victories go, this was not one for the history books, for many reasons. But it did lend more meaning to the phrase Commander in Chief. I felt like Dr Who was once again a bow tie wearing socially awkward guy who lives in a box that is bigger on the inside. Some of the creatures were cool but the CGI didn't quite make them alive. I liked the sloth monkey, I don't really know who it was or what it was doing but I would support a slothmonkey planet of the apes crossover. I like that the guy from SWAT has fina...
Post a Comment
Read more