Skip to main content

Rear Window Review

What I liked: This is the moment we have all been waiting for. After mistakenly watching the Christopher Reeves version and a 2000's remake, I have finally watched Alfred Hitchcock's Rear Window. In some ways it really delivered. Others I felt like I had seen before. I really liked the girl friend's outfits. Granted she is a model, but I thought they looked like things I would like to wear when the vintage mood strikes. The crotchety nurse was funny and delivered some pretty sarcastic lines for the 1950's.The film is based on a book "It had to be murder" but the catchier title comes up when the nurse declares that she is not an expert in rear window ethics (I figured this out myself, take that internet).  I appreciated the creative use of flash photography and, true to form, Hitchcock really shone in the exceptional development of side characters we see only briefly. I liked the makeshift dog elevator and the flowerbed misdirection. I must also credit Hitchcock for creating the original which other two films drew on heavily, in some scenes shot for shot.

What I didn't: Each of the Rear Window retellings has it's own side plot. For the 2000's one it's a teenage romance, for Reeve's it's his enduring faith in stem cell therapy (sorry it's been 20 years and we are still waiting), for Hitchcock it's an ill fated love story. While I just dismissed the other side plots, I was actively rooting for Jimmy Stewart and Grace Kelly's the relationship to end because I thought he was a jerk. So, I was actively more annoyed every time we detoured from the mystery than I was with the other adaptations. I think due to the FCC regulations in the 50's Hitchcock's mystery gets tied up pretty tightly. Not as tight as Disturbia with the oh so subtle body lake, but certainly tighter than the Reeves version which leaves tantalizing loose ends.  I can't believe I'm saying it but the master of suspense gets out suspensed in the dramatic climax by the Reeves version. Maybe because of a more extensive set, maybe because I already knew what would happen by the time I got to Hitchcock, or maybe because of a 400% increase in non-functional limbs, I was more much more concerned about the fate of Reeves and his friends than I was about Jimmy Stewart. Last of all, I found out that the struggling song maker in the film was the musician in real life who went on to create Alvin and the Chipmunks. So all of you who dis like the high-pitched vocals of singing rodents, maybe you can blame the success of this Hitchcock version of Rear Window.

Who should watch this? People who love Hitchcock. People who like mysteries. Probably people who don't already know the ending.

Would I watch it again? I feel like I already have. Twice.

Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ready Player One Review

What I liked: I bet all of the developers loved making this film, I saw so many video game and movie references in the background of scenes. I bet all the developers just inserted their favorites like the ninja turtles, a whole platoon of halo soldiers, and orcs. That it was a video game made it possible and exciting to have all kinds of absolutely random physics and logic defying things happen. Obviously, I loved the T. Rex and who would not enjoy seeing Mechagodzilla or a cyborg orc driving a monster truck? Early in the movie they made good use of the video game architecture in a way that reminded me a bit of secret rooms in super mario. The characters visit the world of the Shining, which was amazing and hilarious. I loved the variety of characters, vehicles and weapons that we get to see and it is more fun (at least for me) that they draw from more than strictly the 1980's. I also really liked the music, for the most part the selections were great for the scenes. The book was...
3 comments
Read more

Fast and Furious 8 review

What I liked: This is the first Fast and Furious movie I have seen but I have watched a number of the trailers. They always teemed with absurdity. Now instead of a 3 minute trailer, I got to sit through an hour and a half of turbo powered sports cars saving the world. As you can imagine the list of things to like is quite long. The movie starts off strong with a car race in Havanah (I guess that US-Cuban relations are going really well if a FBI agent is having his honeymoon there). The reason for the car race was a bit complicated but essentially the main dude was trying to win back his cousin's car. In the course of the race he manages to light it on fire, explode it, and launch it into the ocean. But at least he won it back. I'm sure his cousin was very grateful. I also find it noteworthy that the race was 1 mile long and took 11 minutes to complete. The moral of this story is that while both racers are excellent at theatrics, they take safety seriously. After blowing up B...
1 comment
Read more

Crazy Rich Asians

What I liked: One of the earliest scenes has a flurry of social media. I liked the way it was filmed and thought it was funny and effective. The best friend is remarkably well prepared for almost any eventuality. If she could fit her closet in a utility belt she would be a fashion batman. Without all the cool gadgets and fighting. Just clothes and accessories. Worst Batman ever. I liked her collection of outfits in her trunk. The whole family making dumplings together was surprisingly cute. Until it reminded me of the recent Pixar dumpling short . You can't unsee it now can you? Really, that short is this movie in about 5 minutes. So if you want to save your self some time... The mom is a very effective villain, I think she and Lady Tremaine would get along well. I liked the proposal scene. Of the whole movie this is the part the seems the most realistic. What I didn't: Ok even if we buy the "I just wanted to be a peasant and my true self with you" non-sense, unde...
Post a Comment
Read more