Skip to main content

Lightyear


What I liked: The laser shield. It really shouldn't have taken them 60 years to come up with that plan. The moment Buzz realizes his elite team is not quite who he thought they were. The zap squad. The best I can tell is they are the special forces unit that does nothing besides run around yelling zap. That seems like exactly my level of military service. The tranquilizer dart. The seemingly correct use of time dilation, including "C." That Buzz was a stereotypical '50-'60s test pilot, complete with the deep distrust of computer calculated trajectories. The music accompanying Buzz's stirring speech. That Buzz and Cmd Hawthorne were just friends. The demolitions expert who was generally crotchety and disappointed to not get to blow everything up. 

What I didn't: The fundamental take home message of the movie is that it is better to work with other people than to insist on doing everything yourself. The message is itself sound. However, almost every example I side with the do it yourself Buzz. In the event of a military emergency probably a highly trained military person should not include untrained, unqualified civilians in the strike force. If you are piloting a spacecraft with the only helm, what conceivable job would you give someone who offered to help? The rookie does seem to get in the way and jeopardize everyone on the space ship. Also, I think there is a case to be made for Zurg's plan. Clearly it shouldn't be a unilateral decision, but their society could potentially be greatly benefited by that course. The movie used a lot of Buzz's lines from the original Toy Story. It was fun to hear the quotes but I like them better out of context. Similarly, many of the sound effects are the kinds of sounds kids would make if they were playing with toys like beep beep beep, or meow meow, and yes sadly zap zap zap zap. I acknowledge this ties it more closely to the Toy Story movie, but it is called Lightyear, so I don't know how much more explicit of a tie in you really need. Speaking of things we may not really need, do we actually need the backstory of the fictional history of an action figure in an already fictional movie? Since it is a play within a play essentially, do we treat it like there is an unreliable narrator? That could be more fun. They make a very big deal about losing the formula for their crystal solution. The thing has 4 ingredients and one of you is a computer, I'm pretty sure with minimal effort you could remember the formula. Finally, the cat. Why did we need the cat? Who designed that cat? what was the original purpose of the cat? Why did they think it needed all those random functions but not an extended battery life or enough memory to permanently store a 4 ingredient formula?

Who should watch this? The kids in the theater seemed to like it a lot. They also inexplicably liked the cat. So, I guess children inclined to like robotic cats. 

Would I watch it again? Once was enough. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Titanic

What I liked: Liked is definitely the wrong word for it but the scenes of the sinking of the Titanic were masterful. They were technologically impressive, apparently remarkably accurate, and emotionally gripping. The variety of ways in which different people dealt with a completely hopeless situation was both touching and thought provoking. Especially beautiful was the string quartet. In isolation from the love story, the sinking of the Titanic is a tragic reminder of the cost of hubris and the necessity of regulating emergency procedures and capacities. It carries similar gravitas as a war film. At the 25th anniversary of the film, I can appreciate how Titanic has impacted movies made later.  What I didn't: So here's the thing. I feel very bad for you if you died in the sinking of the Titanic. I feel less bad for you if you managed to get on a lifeboat on the Titanic and then decided to get off. I question all of your decision making and priorities if you decide to get off a...

Mrs Harris goes to Paris

What I liked: This is a happy movie. I liked the dresses and especially how very happy seeing all of the dresses made Mrs Harris. I liked how her enthusiasm wins over the tailor and almost everyone else. Mrs Harris was so delighted with Paris and the people she met that she motivated them to live just a little more enthusiastically and optimistically. From the philosophical model, to the intellectual accountant, to the withdrawn Marquis and the cold director the characters were all imaginatively Parisian (assuming your an American author in the 1950s). I liked that they drove a vespa. I was glad that while Mrs Harris got a fresh view of the world and had a wonderful time in Paris, they steered clear of the potential cliche plot pot holes they could have fallen in. I especially liked her friends who helped her live her dream of going to Paris to buy a dress while really not understanding it at all.  What I didn't: Mrs Harris did such a great job agitating in Paris she really could h...

Avatar 2: The way of water

What I liked: Like the first one, the graphics in this movie are incredible. As one would expect from a movie called the Way of Water, there is a lot of water. The splashes, ripples, and movement in the water are all faultless. When you stop to remember that all of it is CG it's pretty staggering. I also liked that most of the 3D added depth to the film rather than sending 3D effects flying at your face. Our favorite blue family relocates to an island village so we get to meet sea creatures and the island clans. I liked that the sea people had rudder tails and broad hands. And I liked their springy walkways between their houses. Also like the first one, the animals were cool. I liked the plesiosaurs, the shark thing, and the tiny glowy jellyfish things. I really liked the underwater fairie wings. In addition to cool creatures we get cool robots. I  liked the crab robots but am unclear on why they were crabs other than that crabs make cool robots. The plot was better than the first ...