Skip to main content

Kiss Me Kate Review

What I liked: This is a classic musical, or at least it comes in the box set labeled classic musicals. I remembered seeing it in middle school as the movie version of taming of the shrew It wasn’t particularly inspiring at the time and we ended up watching it as part of a girls night after everyone else voted down Indiana Jones and Star Wars, so Kiss Me Kate was not likely to get a good response from me. It turns out there is much more to the movie than we watched in middle school. The more than we watched in middle school isn’t really made up parts relevant to the plot, rather it is all of the famous show tunes that you have never placed: It’s too darn hot, Brush up your Shakespeare, True to you in my own fashion, Why can’t you behave, etc. These songs are great, they are catchy, they are famous, they have nothing to do with each other or the plot. So essentially Kiss Me Kate excels at being a musical. It has an absurd plot that is largely disregarded by the actors and audience, it has long dance interludes for no apparent with remarkably talented performers, it has songs that will be sung by show choirs with better vocals and better staging than the original. The film also had some fun plays on Shakespeare in general and Taming of the Shrew in particular like not letting the leading lady eat the whole night because stage fright upsets her stomach a parallel to one of the tactics used in Taming of the Shrew. I also really liked the dumb thug, he was very funny and I thoroughly enjoyed his performance.
What I didn’t: Many of the advantages that make this undeniably a musical are limitations for a normal movie. What was the plot? wait was this actually mostly the plot of Singing in the Rain? How exactly did the plot resolve? Why do the mafia guys dance? How did this acting troop actually make money? Was the script writing process just “hey look we have all these songs that didn’t fit into any of our other musicals, let’s put them all together and pretend they are related”? Also some of the filming was odd, for example the standard way to shoot a tap dance number is to focus on the feet and zoom in when there is particularly fancy footwork. It is not to focus on the person’s face while fancy footwork is happening, leaving us to wonder if the dancer can actually dance. Finally, the musical was written in 1948 and is a retelling of Taming of the Shrew, so as you can guess, the relationships are highly questionable by today’s standards.
Who should watch this: People who love musicals. Not people who love Shakespeare.
Would I watch it again? No but now I know where all those songs come from.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Titanic

What I liked: Liked is definitely the wrong word for it but the scenes of the sinking of the Titanic were masterful. They were technologically impressive, apparently remarkably accurate, and emotionally gripping. The variety of ways in which different people dealt with a completely hopeless situation was both touching and thought provoking. Especially beautiful was the string quartet. In isolation from the love story, the sinking of the Titanic is a tragic reminder of the cost of hubris and the necessity of regulating emergency procedures and capacities. It carries similar gravitas as a war film. At the 25th anniversary of the film, I can appreciate how Titanic has impacted movies made later.  What I didn't: So here's the thing. I feel very bad for you if you died in the sinking of the Titanic. I feel less bad for you if you managed to get on a lifeboat on the Titanic and then decided to get off. I question all of your decision making and priorities if you decide to get off a...

Annihilation

  What I liked: I liked the crystal trees and the creepy people plants. The multi colored lichen and flowers were cool too. I liked how disorienting the loss of time and flashbacks were, they did a good job of maintaining the disquiet and suspense. I liked that they remembered that mutation and evolution has no goal, it's just a thing that happens with all kinds of side effects. I liked their little boat trip in giant crocodile infested swamp. I'm not sure if I loved the silver skin suit but I can't deny that it was interesting.  What I didn't: The heroes are all scientists who go on a mission to find out what is going on inside the "shimmer". For being all scientists they don't draw very well on their test one variable at a time training. If nothing has ever come out of the shimmer, try sticking a stick in and see if you can pull it out. Step inside with a harness on so if you don't come back they can try and pull you back. Walk in a little ways and t...

Vengeance

What I liked: The premise is absurd. A complete dumpster fire of a person from New York teams up with a Texan red neck to avenge the death of the sister. ... by making a podcast. If that approach to revenge is not the most terrible revenge plan I'm not sure what is. Oh wait, it's Dracula kidnapping a historian to catalog his personal book collection, but that is off topic. Along they way the character gets wildly out of his depth and does things that are definitely bad plans. Like meet with a cartel leader alone in a shed, drive a Prius, visit a music producer, more than once, and give an off the cuff eulogy. Certainly at the beginning it carries the awkward discomfort of The Office but it quickly expands to explosions and the conviction to a podcast found only among the certain portion of the coffee shop population. I thought they did a good job of picking fun at both the rural Texans and the big city New Yorkers. I think they really nailed the "intellectual" bros in...