Skip to main content

Mission Impossible 5 Review


What I liked: Scotty is by far the best part of MI 4 and MI 5. Ethan Hunt has finally lost it; yes he is still the star and yes he still saves the day but there is nowhere left for his character to go besides a retirement home or an insane asylum. The girl is as replaceable as everyother girl in these movies: good trade craft, good looking, good side switching, goodbye. Hawkeye is very concerned, he is concerned about his job, his friends, his country. He is a very responsible suity type, would probably make a great PA. No, Scotty is the one who we connect with, who we cheer for, who we laugh at; Scotty saves the day. As always with MI movies I liked the gadgets (sadly I only remember one mask) and the absurd situations (notably the car chase of death and, as dad calls it, the computer washing machine). At two points I did feel like they were channelling National Treasure and may have quoted the lines that no doubt everyone else was thinking. I liked the moment when hawkeye and scotty find each other. And there is a fight around some pillars that actually has pretty cool aesthetics. It was fun and flashy but not brilliant.
What I didn’t: I may have already given you my opinion of all the characters in the section of what I liked. I may have only liked one of them. It is rather pointless to comment on the absurd situations the team finds themselves in or the absurd ways in which they solve their problems; this is of course all part of the long and time honored legacy of mission impossible. I do however feel the need to point out that possibly the best entry into a whirlpool of death is at ground level and not 4 stories up. If you can sneak in 4 stories up, you can sneak in on the ground floor and people will have less opportunity to see you as you are plummeting to your doom if you jump 2 feet than if you jump 60 feet. Also why do we have so many secret bunkers around that are still fully accessible? I feel like in this budget minded economy someone would notice the power bill running a decommissioned MI safehouse with all the gadgets on. All I’m saying is that if they mothballed the MI program all of that should have gone to army surplus stores. I may be waiting at one just in case. I’m not really sure what the bad guy was going for, possibly a long elaborate con-scheme to get money? but his organization doesn’t really seem to be strapped for cash, I didn’t see them trying to catch an uber for the car chase. The other bad guy could have taken a lesson from everyother spy movie. Clearly the best way to coverup a major debacle is through assasinations not through confusing and ineffective double agent schemes. I mean you will obviously still loose since you are up against the MI team but at least your plan would make sense.
Who should watch this? People in need of a new acceptable action flick.
Would I watch it again?No once was enough. Of the MI movies 1 and 4 are the best and there are enough other spy movies I would watch 12 of those before I got back around to this one.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ready Player One Review

What I liked: I bet all of the developers loved making this film, I saw so many video game and movie references in the background of scenes. I bet all the developers just inserted their favorites like the ninja turtles, a whole platoon of halo soldiers, and orcs. That it was a video game made it possible and exciting to have all kinds of absolutely random physics and logic defying things happen. Obviously, I loved the T. Rex and who would not enjoy seeing Mechagodzilla or a cyborg orc driving a monster truck? Early in the movie they made good use of the video game architecture in a way that reminded me a bit of secret rooms in super mario. The characters visit the world of the Shining, which was amazing and hilarious. I loved the variety of characters, vehicles and weapons that we get to see and it is more fun (at least for me) that they draw from more than strictly the 1980's. I also really liked the music, for the most part the selections were great for the scenes. The book was

Solo Reveiw

What I liked: The architecture of a heist movie has 4 stages: stage 1 explain how hard the job is, stage 2 come up with a ridiculously elaborate plan to accomplish the job and acquire hard to find equipment, stage 3 execute the plan but something goes terribly wrong, stage 4 sneaky twist and huge pay off. The Solo movie takes the bold move of streamlining the first two and a half steps, picking up with stage 3.5 "Something goes terribly wrong". This saves everyone the slow wind up to the actual action. This saved time translates into a movie with not one but all the heists. We have grand theft, customs evasion, train robbery, vault robbery, the classic hustle, and of course smuggling. I guess they may have tried to crowd too a little much in because they also almost always skip stage 4. This stage skipping also means that we don't know if the things they are doing are actually hard or they are just incompetent. I'm surprised more heist movies don't explore this

Wrinkle in Time Review

What I liked: I liked Charles Wallace, that kid was funny. I liked that the ladies in crazy dresses were warriors and that the kids were warriors too. You know me I'm all about a good action movie with awesome fighting, but I liked that at least in this universe the defining characteristics of warriors were compassion, kindness, and love. Similarly, I liked that the bad guys weren't launching a massive military conquest of the universe, I mean everyone is doing that these days. Surprisingly, I liked the Mrs's dresses. They were crazy and over the top but it was fun that they changed with every teleportation and that they were completely absurd. The outfits were rather like the Mrs's wearing them, over the top and fantastical. Knowing all of them from other shows I may have had some unfulfilled expectations. At no point did anyone say "You get a wrinkle, and you get a wrinkle, Everyone gets a wrinkle!" which I must admit was a little disappointing. I also think