Skip to main content

The Martian Review




What I liked: I like science and I like outerspace, clearly I liked a movie about science in outerspace. I liked the timelapse sequences of solving problems and growing stuff. I thought they did a remarkably good job conveying a plot consisting of technical questions and keeping people engaged. I liked that Matt Damon was trapped on Mars with no entertainment but disco music, which made a surprisingly good soundtrack. I liked that NASA got to be the heroes in two big movies this year. I loved that Boromir got to be in on the council of Elrond again, that was phenomenal. I wonder if they cast him specifically for that reason. I gained a new appreciation for Anderson; I never knew he had a knack for astrophysics. I guess after being driven to distraction by Sherlock he decided for a change of career and started working for NASA. Speaking of careers working for NASA I want to be whoever it was who got to drill holes in the rover, that looked like fun. I loved the mars rover, both of them. Potatoes! and interesting toppings.Space pirates! I liked seeing good old New Mexico, I really think we have been to the filming location. I think my favorite part was laughing in anticipation of his solutions to the problems when I figured them out.
What I didn’t: For being a story about solving technical problems with science and engineering, these people did very little math. Not that I want to watch them do math but I do feel like something like calculating orbital angles and velocities should probably be done ahead of time and probably with a calculator. I was totally on board with the solutions until about the last 30 min of the movie where they kept getting increasingly absurd. Blowing up your own spaceship is never the correct solution, especially if your response to a damage report is “we’ll worry about that later.” Nope, you probably should have worried about it before you decided to do it. Most of the characters had potential but were sort of blah; I think Damon was a little hobbled by needing to explain everything to his starlog. He was much better than when he was trapped on a deserted planet in Interstellar (still not sure why NASA let him keep going into space after that) but he wasn’t as good as Hanks trapped on a deserted island, or Hanks trapped in space for that matter. I appreciate that running simulations is an important part of solving a problem but I feel like usually the way to do that is not to plug in your laptop to the bank of the supercomputer with a curly usb cable. When the rescue mission is going to take over a year, why would you need to scrub two days of tests? I mean he’s already hungry two days is not going to be that big a deal. Two months? sure, you should probably do some expediting. But 2 days? for a 5% disaster probability? Bad plan. Is there any movie anyone can think of in which the PR people are good guys?
Who should watch this? It was a well made space movie. I think just about everyone would appreciate it.
Would I watch it again? yep, while eating french fries.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ready Player One Review

What I liked: I bet all of the developers loved making this film, I saw so many video game and movie references in the background of scenes. I bet all the developers just inserted their favorites like the ninja turtles, a whole platoon of halo soldiers, and orcs. That it was a video game made it possible and exciting to have all kinds of absolutely random physics and logic defying things happen. Obviously, I loved the T. Rex and who would not enjoy seeing Mechagodzilla or a cyborg orc driving a monster truck? Early in the movie they made good use of the video game architecture in a way that reminded me a bit of secret rooms in super mario. The characters visit the world of the Shining, which was amazing and hilarious. I loved the variety of characters, vehicles and weapons that we get to see and it is more fun (at least for me) that they draw from more than strictly the 1980's. I also really liked the music, for the most part the selections were great for the scenes. The book was

Solo Reveiw

What I liked: The architecture of a heist movie has 4 stages: stage 1 explain how hard the job is, stage 2 come up with a ridiculously elaborate plan to accomplish the job and acquire hard to find equipment, stage 3 execute the plan but something goes terribly wrong, stage 4 sneaky twist and huge pay off. The Solo movie takes the bold move of streamlining the first two and a half steps, picking up with stage 3.5 "Something goes terribly wrong". This saves everyone the slow wind up to the actual action. This saved time translates into a movie with not one but all the heists. We have grand theft, customs evasion, train robbery, vault robbery, the classic hustle, and of course smuggling. I guess they may have tried to crowd too a little much in because they also almost always skip stage 4. This stage skipping also means that we don't know if the things they are doing are actually hard or they are just incompetent. I'm surprised more heist movies don't explore this

Wrinkle in Time Review

What I liked: I liked Charles Wallace, that kid was funny. I liked that the ladies in crazy dresses were warriors and that the kids were warriors too. You know me I'm all about a good action movie with awesome fighting, but I liked that at least in this universe the defining characteristics of warriors were compassion, kindness, and love. Similarly, I liked that the bad guys weren't launching a massive military conquest of the universe, I mean everyone is doing that these days. Surprisingly, I liked the Mrs's dresses. They were crazy and over the top but it was fun that they changed with every teleportation and that they were completely absurd. The outfits were rather like the Mrs's wearing them, over the top and fantastical. Knowing all of them from other shows I may have had some unfulfilled expectations. At no point did anyone say "You get a wrinkle, and you get a wrinkle, Everyone gets a wrinkle!" which I must admit was a little disappointing. I also think