Skip to main content

Jurassic Park III Review

What I liked: I like dinosaurs. I still like dinosaurs after this movie. I like that they specifically introduced dinosaurs with the best people eating potential regardless of plot, biology, or previous story line. I like that the Spinosaurus' nose is the exact right size to snuffle inside a downed airplane in search of juicy people snacks. I like that the Spinosaurus' response to biting an airplane in half is not "that wasn't delicious" but "I wonder if there are tiny bits of delicious inside." I like that the paleontologists had a 3D printed model of a velociraptor nose and that they learned how to play it and that they could play it correctly to communicate with the raptors. When I try speaking another language that, you know is designed for human mouths, it comes out all gibberish. When I try playing any instrument, it comes out sounding like a slide whistle (this could be one of the reasons that I favor the slide whistle). These protagonists successfully mastered the new instrument and new language thing. In one go. While about to be eaten by dinosaurs. I think the moral of this story is everyone should take paleontologists duck hunting with them, the duck calls will be so successful they will immediately be over run by ducks. Hitchcock would be jealous. I like that the satellite phone survived multiple Spinosaurus attacks. Forget making the whole airplane out of the black box, I doubt it survived the crushing, make the whole airplane out of satellite phone.

What I didn't: This movie has stolen the quote I used to describe the previous installment "the worst idea in the long sad history of bad ideas." These include but are not limited to: Parasailing over a dinosaur infested island, kidnapping, dinosaurnapping, living in an upsidedown water truck, chasing humans when there boxes full of chocolate bars, just staring at trapped humans, parasailing with dinosaurs, playing a bad flute with dinosaurs, carrying a dinosaur flute but not a survival kit when trapped on a dinosaur infested island, hiring fake mercenaries, being a fake mercenary, allowing paleontologists to issue military orders, an armed invasion of a dinosaur infested island, not shooting escaping dinosaurs during an armed invasion of a dinosaur island, hiding from dinosaurs in a stampeding herd of giant dinosaurs, etc. By this point Jurassic Park has devolved into a poorly executed monster movie with bad acting, dumb characters, and predictable jump scenes. There was potential in one scene that the dinosaurs intentionally lured the humans to be eaten by imitating a cell phone ring (birds imitating cellphones and crosswalk timers was kind of a big story in the 90s). Sadly they missed the opportunity to make everyone think of dinosaurs when they hear a phone ring. 

Who should watch this? Probably no one. Unless you are thinking about watching Batman (1989). Then watch Jurassic Park III.

Would I watch it again? Nope. Of the now four Jurassic Park movies 1,2, and 4 are the best. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ready Player One Review

What I liked: I bet all of the developers loved making this film, I saw so many video game and movie references in the background of scenes. I bet all the developers just inserted their favorites like the ninja turtles, a whole platoon of halo soldiers, and orcs. That it was a video game made it possible and exciting to have all kinds of absolutely random physics and logic defying things happen. Obviously, I loved the T. Rex and who would not enjoy seeing Mechagodzilla or a cyborg orc driving a monster truck? Early in the movie they made good use of the video game architecture in a way that reminded me a bit of secret rooms in super mario. The characters visit the world of the Shining, which was amazing and hilarious. I loved the variety of characters, vehicles and weapons that we get to see and it is more fun (at least for me) that they draw from more than strictly the 1980's. I also really liked the music, for the most part the selections were great for the scenes. The book was

Solo Reveiw

What I liked: The architecture of a heist movie has 4 stages: stage 1 explain how hard the job is, stage 2 come up with a ridiculously elaborate plan to accomplish the job and acquire hard to find equipment, stage 3 execute the plan but something goes terribly wrong, stage 4 sneaky twist and huge pay off. The Solo movie takes the bold move of streamlining the first two and a half steps, picking up with stage 3.5 "Something goes terribly wrong". This saves everyone the slow wind up to the actual action. This saved time translates into a movie with not one but all the heists. We have grand theft, customs evasion, train robbery, vault robbery, the classic hustle, and of course smuggling. I guess they may have tried to crowd too a little much in because they also almost always skip stage 4. This stage skipping also means that we don't know if the things they are doing are actually hard or they are just incompetent. I'm surprised more heist movies don't explore this

Wrinkle in Time Review

What I liked: I liked Charles Wallace, that kid was funny. I liked that the ladies in crazy dresses were warriors and that the kids were warriors too. You know me I'm all about a good action movie with awesome fighting, but I liked that at least in this universe the defining characteristics of warriors were compassion, kindness, and love. Similarly, I liked that the bad guys weren't launching a massive military conquest of the universe, I mean everyone is doing that these days. Surprisingly, I liked the Mrs's dresses. They were crazy and over the top but it was fun that they changed with every teleportation and that they were completely absurd. The outfits were rather like the Mrs's wearing them, over the top and fantastical. Knowing all of them from other shows I may have had some unfulfilled expectations. At no point did anyone say "You get a wrinkle, and you get a wrinkle, Everyone gets a wrinkle!" which I must admit was a little disappointing. I also think