What I didn't: The first three Bourne movies had phenomenal choreography and helped things feel intense with tight shots and some shakiness. This entire film was tight shots and shaky and intentionally out of focus, even for things that didn't need to feel particularly stressful. I spent a lot of time shouting in my head "AAAA too close! Too close!" and expecting to smack into the actors. I usually don't mind some intense shaky camera action but there was enough in this film to give me a headache and make me feel kind of sick. The shake and lack of focus was particularly annoying when there were words to be reading. All of this might be better on a TV; maybe the big screen just accentuated it. I do feel like at some point one of the interview questions for the head of the CIA should be "are you evil?" I think it would save everyone a lot of time since as far as I know, with the exception of when Jack Ryan ran the CIA, there has never been a non evil head of the CIA in a movie. If one insists on hiring an evil CIA director, The director of the NSA should at least be competent. I am under the impression that this one had had his brain replaced with mashed potatoes. Clearly nothing could go wrong with having your final showdown in a convention full of spy gear. This was both a terrible plan and disappointingly under utilized by the master spies roaming the building. Also for future reference it is a bad idea to try and whack an assassin over the head if you are not an assassin. It is probably a bad idea if you are an assassin too, maybe they tell you these things in assassin school.
Who should watch this? People who love Bourne movies
Would I watch it again? good to see once, if the shaking is better on a small screen I might watch it again.
Comments
Post a Comment