Skip to main content

Guardians of the Galaxy 2 Review

What I liked: Baby Groot is the best thing about this movies. If you have seen the trailer with the extended conversation between Rocket the raccoon and baby Groot about when to push the detonation button, you have seen the best of the movie and if you're pressed for time, can probably leave it at that. If you have more time you could expand your viewing to include the opening fight scene, with some pretty awesome alien smashing action, rainbows, and classic rock music, and the concluding fight scene, which involves baby Groot, explosions, and Pacman. If you really want to branch out you can watch a fight scene in the middle that mostly involves about 100 mercenaries being beaten by a raccoon in the woods. I liked that Rocky has moved on from his boxing career to being an intergalactic criminal, it really seems like a step up. I predict that in the next movie he will be the underdog in a boxing match with an alien and will make an incredible comeback to win. I liked that the bad guys' whole space ship fleet was just an arcade game. If my experience in flight simulators is any indication, this is not a very effective military. I have decided that the firework funeral is the best plan ever. I hope my wake will consist of nothing but millions of fireworks.

What I didn't: First and foremost the music was not as good. There is a lot of cool classic rock music they really could have picked better songs. The evil master plan is dumb both in premise and execution. Evil villains these days, the all want to rule the universe. Can't they just try and rob a bank or something? Build a cool death ray? You may remember from the last movie that this group of heroes is made up entirely of scoundrels: assassins, thieves, bounty hunters, mercenaries, etc. It seems to be one of the goals of this movie to remind us that these heroes are bad people. They succeed rather gruesomely. Most of what made the first movie funny was that the jokes were unexpected and well timed. Instead of coming up with more clever or unexpected ideas the writers just expanded the jokes they made the first time. So, there were more inappropriate jokes, more awkward statements, and more random things that happened. But since it was all more of the same none of it was unexpected and so it lost most of the comic effectiveness. The other thing that the first movie had going for it was that it really didn't take itself too seriously. This one tries to be a little bit profound which really works against the whole silly nonsense thing they had going. So, it is mostly nonsense but not good at being silly.

Who should watch this? If you liked the first one, you will like this one, it's more of the same. If you didn't like the first one, you won't like this one, it's more of the same.

Would I watch it again? I'd rather watch the first one but there are scenes from this one that I will find online.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Titanic

What I liked: Liked is definitely the wrong word for it but the scenes of the sinking of the Titanic were masterful. They were technologically impressive, apparently remarkably accurate, and emotionally gripping. The variety of ways in which different people dealt with a completely hopeless situation was both touching and thought provoking. Especially beautiful was the string quartet. In isolation from the love story, the sinking of the Titanic is a tragic reminder of the cost of hubris and the necessity of regulating emergency procedures and capacities. It carries similar gravitas as a war film. At the 25th anniversary of the film, I can appreciate how Titanic has impacted movies made later.  What I didn't: So here's the thing. I feel very bad for you if you died in the sinking of the Titanic. I feel less bad for you if you managed to get on a lifeboat on the Titanic and then decided to get off. I question all of your decision making and priorities if you decide to get off a...
Post a Comment
Read more

Annihilation

  What I liked: I liked the crystal trees and the creepy people plants. The multi colored lichen and flowers were cool too. I liked how disorienting the loss of time and flashbacks were, they did a good job of maintaining the disquiet and suspense. I liked that they remembered that mutation and evolution has no goal, it's just a thing that happens with all kinds of side effects. I liked their little boat trip in giant crocodile infested swamp. I'm not sure if I loved the silver skin suit but I can't deny that it was interesting.  What I didn't: The heroes are all scientists who go on a mission to find out what is going on inside the "shimmer". For being all scientists they don't draw very well on their test one variable at a time training. If nothing has ever come out of the shimmer, try sticking a stick in and see if you can pull it out. Step inside with a harness on so if you don't come back they can try and pull you back. Walk in a little ways and t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Vengeance

What I liked: The premise is absurd. A complete dumpster fire of a person from New York teams up with a Texan red neck to avenge the death of the sister. ... by making a podcast. If that approach to revenge is not the most terrible revenge plan I'm not sure what is. Oh wait, it's Dracula kidnapping a historian to catalog his personal book collection, but that is off topic. Along they way the character gets wildly out of his depth and does things that are definitely bad plans. Like meet with a cartel leader alone in a shed, drive a Prius, visit a music producer, more than once, and give an off the cuff eulogy. Certainly at the beginning it carries the awkward discomfort of The Office but it quickly expands to explosions and the conviction to a podcast found only among the certain portion of the coffee shop population. I thought they did a good job of picking fun at both the rural Texans and the big city New Yorkers. I think they really nailed the "intellectual" bros in...
Post a Comment
Read more