Skip to main content

Coco Review

What I  liked: The skeletons. They were fun They were fashionable. Even when they had some assembly required they didn't seem to mind very much. They were also remarkably dexterous for not having any muscles or connective tissue, but they do have hair. And eyebrows, which is some cases is illegal. Also for not having lungs or diaphrams, they are pretty remarkable singers. The songs were all lots of fun and stick in your head. And the bonus flexibility that detachable limbs provides them, the skeletons also have pretty great dance numbers to go with their songs. The spirit animals. I have seen Alebrija in fairs and museums seeing them on the big screen in all their neon fully animated glory was great. Some skeletons have better spirit animals than others, The great great grandmother has an awesome winged jaguar. Others are ... less impressive. Frida kahlo made some very...um... artistic appearances. Like my reaction to most art installations I agree with the sentiment that it was too obvious. I liked the family, they were busy and bustling and happy. Despite their disagreement over a rather extreme absolute ban on music and some excessive and highly effective shoe fwapping, they clearly love and care for eachother. Enough to start twelve year old Miguel on his shoe making career with his very own unwanted leather apron. I like that the spirit bridge is made entirely of flower petals and although it is completely composed of petals and lacks all forms of foundational support, it is remarkably sturdy. And even though it is all very slippery flower petals and there is lots of running, no one goes careening over the edge to the inevitable drop of doom.

What I didn't: The dog. It is an unspoken Disney rule that every main character must have a useless, ugly, animal side kick. And much like Moana, this iteration is particularly annoying. At least this presumably loveable street dog is occasionally helpful, but mostly you think "that dog should really have a rabies shot before anyone pets him." The TSA like skeleton body scanners. It heralds a dark dystopian future when the government can run facial recognition on your skull and find any picture of you around the world. Not only that but there is an immediate read out of the people responsible for placing the picture and their location. Just try and tell me this technology is not going to feature in an upcoming spy movie. For being the powerful mastermind of a great shoe empire, the grandma has quite flimsy shoes. Her marketing branch sbould look into that. The whole troup of dancers should have been arrested for illegal eyebrow use.

Who should watch this? It's a great Pixar movie but probably not for young kids. The skeletons are friendly but still skeletons and the kid is slowly turning into a skeleton as time runs out to escape the land of the dead. It could be a little scary.

Would I watch it again? Yes! I'm excited for it to come out on DVD!
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Titanic

What I liked: Liked is definitely the wrong word for it but the scenes of the sinking of the Titanic were masterful. They were technologically impressive, apparently remarkably accurate, and emotionally gripping. The variety of ways in which different people dealt with a completely hopeless situation was both touching and thought provoking. Especially beautiful was the string quartet. In isolation from the love story, the sinking of the Titanic is a tragic reminder of the cost of hubris and the necessity of regulating emergency procedures and capacities. It carries similar gravitas as a war film. At the 25th anniversary of the film, I can appreciate how Titanic has impacted movies made later.  What I didn't: So here's the thing. I feel very bad for you if you died in the sinking of the Titanic. I feel less bad for you if you managed to get on a lifeboat on the Titanic and then decided to get off. I question all of your decision making and priorities if you decide to get off a...
Post a Comment
Read more

Annihilation

  What I liked: I liked the crystal trees and the creepy people plants. The multi colored lichen and flowers were cool too. I liked how disorienting the loss of time and flashbacks were, they did a good job of maintaining the disquiet and suspense. I liked that they remembered that mutation and evolution has no goal, it's just a thing that happens with all kinds of side effects. I liked their little boat trip in giant crocodile infested swamp. I'm not sure if I loved the silver skin suit but I can't deny that it was interesting.  What I didn't: The heroes are all scientists who go on a mission to find out what is going on inside the "shimmer". For being all scientists they don't draw very well on their test one variable at a time training. If nothing has ever come out of the shimmer, try sticking a stick in and see if you can pull it out. Step inside with a harness on so if you don't come back they can try and pull you back. Walk in a little ways and t...
Post a Comment
Read more

See how the run

What I liked: I liked how very enthusiastic the sergeant was. And I appreciated that, remarkably, both the senior detective and the assistant were competent. It seems like usually this is a one or the other kind of pairing so I lament the partnership that inevitably formed somewhere else in the department of two incompetent officers. The story boarding was very fun and it was very clear that the director in the film had never seen nor heard anything about The Mousetrap. I liked the recurring snow shovel. For the second time in as many months the detectives were using the means, motive, opportunity chart for the suspects. Still no sign of a murderer using one though.   What I didn't: Why after you take a tumble through a cake and a pile of shellfish would you go find a replacement outfit in the costume department of the theater instead of just going back to your house? I mean I might enjoy that, you could come back to the party dressed as Henry VIII, or a demigorgon, or a tree....
Post a Comment
Read more