Skip to main content

Coco Review

What I  liked: The skeletons. They were fun They were fashionable. Even when they had some assembly required they didn't seem to mind very much. They were also remarkably dexterous for not having any muscles or connective tissue, but they do have hair. And eyebrows, which is some cases is illegal. Also for not having lungs or diaphrams, they are pretty remarkable singers. The songs were all lots of fun and stick in your head. And the bonus flexibility that detachable limbs provides them, the skeletons also have pretty great dance numbers to go with their songs. The spirit animals. I have seen Alebrija in fairs and museums seeing them on the big screen in all their neon fully animated glory was great. Some skeletons have better spirit animals than others, The great great grandmother has an awesome winged jaguar. Others are ... less impressive. Frida kahlo made some very...um... artistic appearances. Like my reaction to most art installations I agree with the sentiment that it was too obvious. I liked the family, they were busy and bustling and happy. Despite their disagreement over a rather extreme absolute ban on music and some excessive and highly effective shoe fwapping, they clearly love and care for eachother. Enough to start twelve year old Miguel on his shoe making career with his very own unwanted leather apron. I like that the spirit bridge is made entirely of flower petals and although it is completely composed of petals and lacks all forms of foundational support, it is remarkably sturdy. And even though it is all very slippery flower petals and there is lots of running, no one goes careening over the edge to the inevitable drop of doom.

What I didn't: The dog. It is an unspoken Disney rule that every main character must have a useless, ugly, animal side kick. And much like Moana, this iteration is particularly annoying. At least this presumably loveable street dog is occasionally helpful, but mostly you think "that dog should really have a rabies shot before anyone pets him." The TSA like skeleton body scanners. It heralds a dark dystopian future when the government can run facial recognition on your skull and find any picture of you around the world. Not only that but there is an immediate read out of the people responsible for placing the picture and their location. Just try and tell me this technology is not going to feature in an upcoming spy movie. For being the powerful mastermind of a great shoe empire, the grandma has quite flimsy shoes. Her marketing branch sbould look into that. The whole troup of dancers should have been arrested for illegal eyebrow use.

Who should watch this? It's a great Pixar movie but probably not for young kids. The skeletons are friendly but still skeletons and the kid is slowly turning into a skeleton as time runs out to escape the land of the dead. It could be a little scary.

Would I watch it again? Yes! I'm excited for it to come out on DVD!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Titanic

What I liked: Liked is definitely the wrong word for it but the scenes of the sinking of the Titanic were masterful. They were technologically impressive, apparently remarkably accurate, and emotionally gripping. The variety of ways in which different people dealt with a completely hopeless situation was both touching and thought provoking. Especially beautiful was the string quartet. In isolation from the love story, the sinking of the Titanic is a tragic reminder of the cost of hubris and the necessity of regulating emergency procedures and capacities. It carries similar gravitas as a war film. At the 25th anniversary of the film, I can appreciate how Titanic has impacted movies made later.  What I didn't: So here's the thing. I feel very bad for you if you died in the sinking of the Titanic. I feel less bad for you if you managed to get on a lifeboat on the Titanic and then decided to get off. I question all of your decision making and priorities if you decide to get off a...

Free Guy

What I liked: I liked Guy. That is in fact the point but I like how happy, carefree, and wholesome he is in what is essentially Grand Theft Auto. I like what the NPCs decide to focus on as they achieve consciousness. I liked the ridiculous YouTubers getting all philosophical about Guy and how he radically changed game play. I liked that so much of the game economy was about silly skins, just like a real game, and how that completely confused the NPCs. I liked the fight between Dude and Guy and its resolution, it managed to stay very on theme. The item cameos were fun, like seeing the Portal gun, or the Fortnite piñata. I liked guy finding the med kit and building up an inventory.  What I didn't: I am not be a lawyer but I am suspicious that there maybe more efficient ways of obtaining evidence of copyright violation than playing 12 hours of a computer game every day. With that in mind I think the evidence points to the heroine enjoying the game far more than she lets on. On the top...

Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them Reveiw

What I liked: For a movie based on what is in essence a fictional encyclopedia, this movie has a surprising amount of plot. Not great plot, but more than I usually get from reading an alphabetical reference book. I liked the dopey sidekick, his facial expressions were great and he was the only one who acknowledged that what happening on screen was not actually normal. I liked that the president led the tiny army of US wizards to their tiny battle in a subway. So as military victories go, this was not one for the history books, for many reasons. But it did lend more meaning to the phrase Commander in Chief. I felt like Dr Who was once again a bow tie wearing socially awkward guy who lives in a box that is bigger on the inside. Some of the creatures were cool but the CGI didn't quite make them alive. I liked the sloth monkey, I don't really know who it was or what it was doing but I would support a slothmonkey planet of the apes crossover. I like that the guy from SWAT has fina...